Skip to content
  • +61 3 8644 7320
  • Email
  • Phone 7am to 12 Midnight - 7 days
  • Make a Booking
  • 中文
  • Locations
  • Contact
Search
Close
  • +61 3 8644 7320
  • Phone 7am to 12am - 7 days
  • 中文
Search
Close
  • 中文
Search
Close
  • +61 3 8644 7320
  • Phone 7am to Midnight - 7 days

Phone Appointments and Video Conferences Available

IMPORTANT COVID-19 COURT NEWS UPDATE

Dribbin & Brown Criminal Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Our Lawyers
  • Criminal Defences
  • The System
  • Sentences
  • Blog
  • Locations
  • Contact
Menu
  • Legal Services
  • Our Lawyers
  • Criminal Defences
  • The System
  • Sentences
  • Blog
  • Locations
  • Contact

s49(1)(ca) Refusing to Undergo Assessment for Drug Impairment? 

Have you been charged with refusing to undergo assessment for drug impairment? 

There a number of technicalities in relation to this charge, and it is important that if you have been charged with refusing to undergo a drug impairment assessment that you seek the guidance of an experienced traffic offence lawyer.

There are a number of issues to consider if you have been charged with this offence.

  • Were you driving in charge of a motor vehicle and stopped by police?
  • Did you refuse to undergo an assessment for drug impairment?
  • Did you undertake the procedure satisfactorily or do your level best?
  • Have you been charged for similar offence in the past?

It is an offence against the Road Safety Act 1986 (RSA) section 49(1)(ca) to refuse to undergo an assessment for drug impairment in accordance with section 55A of the RSA. If the police officer suspects that person’s behaviour or appearance indicates that he or she may be impaired for a reason other than alcohol alone the police have the authority to request that person undergo as assessment for drug impairment.

Section 55A provides that a police officer may, at any time deem necessary, require:

  • any person they find in charge of or driving a motor vehicle; or
  • the driver of a vehicle stopped at a preliminary testing station; or
  • any person they believe was in charge of or driving a motor vehicle within 3 hours of when it was involved in an accident, or
  • any person they believe was an occupant in a motor vehicle within 3 hours when it was involved in an accident –

to undergo such a test.

A refusal can either be verbal or by conduct. Refusing an assessment of drug impairment includes:

1. verbally refusing the request of police;
2. refusing to accompany police to a place to undergo an assessment; or
3. refuse to undergo the assessment by being physically obstructive.

The police must adhere to certain procedural requirements when requesting and conducting an assessment of drug impairment. These include, but are not limited to:

  • Being an authorised police officer for the purposes of carrying out an assessment of drug impairment; and
  • Carrying out the assessment in accordance with legislated procedure; and
  • Video-recording the assessment (except in special circumstances); and
  • Providing a copy of the video to the accused.

If any of these requirements have not been followed, an assessment of drug impairment may be rendered inadmissible.

Under s 49(1A), the police officer requesting the assessment of drug impairment need not be an authorised officer, and the request need not be made at the place the assessment is to take place. It is simply refusal of the request which constitutes the offence.

As outlined below the periods of licence disqualification are double the mandatory minimum of that where an offender copmlies with the test but is considered impaired.

Please read below for more information relating to this charge.

The offence

 Section 49(1)(ca) of the Road Safety Act 1986.

The prosecution must that:

  1. The defendant was driving or in charge of a motor vehicle; and
  2. The defendant refused to undergo assessment for drug impairment in accordance with section 55Aof the Road Safety Act 1986.

The penalty

If found guilty of an Offence Involving Alcohol or Other Drugs: Refusing to Undergo an Assessment for Drug Impairment the maximum penalties are:

  1. For a first offence, a fine of 12 penalty units.
  2. For a second offence, a fine of 120 penalty units or imprisonment for a term of 12 months.
  3. For a third or subsequent offence, a fine of 180 penalty units or imprisonment for a term of 18 months.

Further, pursuant to section 50(1D), if a person is convicted or found guilty of an offence against section 49(1)(ca) for refusing to undergo an assessment for drug impairment when requested to do so, the court must suspend that person’s driver licence or learner permit, and disqualify them from driving for a minimum period of:

  • 2 years for a first offence.
  • 4 years for any subsequent offence.

Where will my case be heard?

Refusing to Undergo Assessment for Drug Impairment cases will be heard will be heard in the Magistrates Court.

Questions to consider

Do you have a defence?

How to avoid a record through the spent conviction legislation by achieving a non-conviction.

If you are pleading guilty, what can you do to minimise your sentence?

What to do next?

Seek advice from experienced traffic offence lawyers.

Preparation is critical to the success of any matter, if you have been charged with refusal to undergo an assessment for drug impairment when driving or in control of a motor vehicle and if your driver’s licence is important to you, don’t go to court unrepresented. Losing your driver’s licence or going to gaol will be a costly exercise.

If you have been charged with refusing to undergo an assessment of drug impairment, a police officer may suspend your licence immediately, as per section 85A of the RSA see article. This would mean you cannot drive until your matter has been determined at court, but this suspension can be appealed while awaiting the court hearing for the alleged offence.

The police and the courts take driving offences very seriously to avoid severe penalties you need to be represented; Dribbin & Brown Lawyers are experienced in handling these types of matters. We regularly appear in court to represent people charged with driving offences.

The Legislation

Section 49 Offences involving alcohol or other drugs

(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he or she—

(ca) refuses to undergo an assessment of drug impairment in accordance with section 55A when required under that section to do so or refuses to comply with any other   requirement made under section 55A(1);

(1A) A person may be convicted or found guilty of an offence under paragraph (c), (ca), (e), (ea) or (eb) of subsection (1) even if—

(a) in the case of an offence under paragraph (c), a prescribed device was not presented to the person at the time of the making of the requirement; and

(b) in the case of an offence under paragraph (ca)—

(i) a requirement to undergo an assessment of drug impairment was not made at a place where such an assessment could have been carried out; and

(ii) a police officer authorised to carry out an assessment of drug impairment was not present at the place where the requirement was made at the time it was                   made; and

(3) A person who is guilty of an offence under paragraph (ba), (c), (ca), (d), (e) or (ea) of subsection (1), other than a supervising driver offence, is liable—

(a) in the case of a first offence, to a fine of not more than 12 penalty units; and

(b) in the case of a second offence, to a fine of not more than 120 penalty units  or to imprisonment for a term of not more than 12 months; and

(c) in the case of any other subsequent offence, to a fine of not more than 180 penalty units or to imprisonment for a term of not more than 18 months.

Drug Driving Charges

Road Safety Act 1986

Drug Driving Offences Melbourne (Article)

s49(1)(ba) Driving Whilst Impaired by a Drug

s49(1)(bb) Driving a Motor Vehicle with Prescribed Content of Drugs in system

s49(1)(bc) Drive with Prescribed Concentration of Drug and Alcohol

s49(1)(ca) Refusing to Undergo Assessment for Drug Impairment? 

s49(1)(ea) Refusing to comply with Directions to Provide Additional Samples for Analysis? 

s49(1)(eb) Refusing to Undergo Oral Fluid Test? 

s49(1)(h) Detection of a Prescribed Illicit Drug (Oral Sample) within 3 Hours of Driving or being in Charge of  a Motor Vehicle? 

s49(1)(i) Exceeding the Prescribed Concentration of a Prescribed Illicit Drug (Blood Analysis) within 3 Hours of Driving or being in Charge of a Motor Vehicle

s49(1)(j) ExPCA (Blood Analysis) of alcohol and drugs within 3 Hours of Driving of being in Charge of a Motor Vehicle

s84 Motor Vehicle Impoundment / Forfeiture by Police

s85 Appeal Immediate Licence Suspension

Related Offences

  • View Drink Driving Offences
  • View Driving Offences

Case Studies

Application for rehearing

Dangerous Driving

Drink & Drug Driving Charges

Drink Driving Charges Ringwood Magistrates Court

Drink Driving Offences – Penalties

Driving Charges Without Conviction

Driving Offences – Careless Driving

Driving Offences – Driving Whilst Suspended

Driving Whilst Suspended – Frankston

Impoundment Exceptional Hardship

Licence Restoration

Reckless Conduct Endanger Serious Injury

Our Legal Services

Appeals

Assault Offences

Asset Confiscation

Bail Application

Breach Offences

Centrelink Fraud

Children’s Court

Computer Offences

Council Charges

Drink Driving

Driving Offences

Drug Offences

Family Violence

Firearm Offences

Fraud Offences

Infringement Warrants

Intervention Orders

Murder Trials

Perjury Charges

Pervert the Course of Justice

Royal Commission

RSPCA Offences

Sex Offences

Theft

Traffic Offences

Violence

Weapons

White Collar Crime

  • Law Institute Accredited Specialist Criminal Lawyers
  • Legal Aid enquiries welcome
  • Over 100 years firm experience practising as traffic lawyers and criminal defence lawyers
specialist criminal solicitor warning
Do not ask any firm to act on your behalf in relation to a criminal or traffic law offence unless they specialise in criminal or traffic law.
  • Law Institute Accredited Specialist Criminal Lawyers
  • Legal Aid enquiries welcome
  • Over 100 years firm experience practising as traffic lawyers and criminal defence lawyers
specialist criminal solicitor warning
Do not ask any firm to act on your behalf in relation to a criminal or traffic law offence unless they specialise in criminal or traffic law.

What Our Clients Say

Adrian W
A big thank you Dave. You made it seamless. You are a quality egg and hopefully I'll see you again under different circumstances. All the best!
Sam B
Thank you for your outstanding service.... A great result for us...
Russell P
Dear David and Team I would like to “Thank You” for a job well done. The result, from the trial was truly amazing. I very much appreciated your courtesy, professionalism...
Michael S
Dear Rebeca, Thank you again for your support and guidance over the past six months, it is my belief that Dribbin and Brown went far beyond there charter when...
Maria
Many thanks for the wonderful support I received from David Dribbin as he represented me in court today. It was an extremely emotional experience for me and without judgement...
Haley M
We cannot thank you enough, it still doesn't feel real to us yet as it has caused a lot of strain and stress over a very long period of...
Grant B
I phoned Michael Brown of Dribbin and Brown after total disappointment in another criminal lawyer firm... In my situation that required communication, information and a great deal of understanding,...
Helen and Lingbo Yang
Thank you for your support and help of Lingbo’s case for these days and everything is going smoothly. The outcome is better than we expected because of your rich...
Yvonne and Peter Braithwaite
Thanks for your excellent work for Yvonne last Friday. Your courtesy, empathy and professionalism was greatly appreciated. All the best for the future.
Ross M
Dear Dave, Just a follow up thanks for your professional service & presentation yesterday – very happy with the outcome and the comments from the Magistrate. Thanks again, and...
…
Mike! Jacqui was great! Re my drive whist suspended charge, I held my license with a small fine to be payed in 4 months! Can't thank you enough! Thanks for...

Need help? Call our 7am to Midnight Phone Service on +61 (03) 8644 7320

Dribbin & Brown Criminal Solicitors Melbourne

Facebook-f Twitter

© 2021 Dribbin & Brown

Melbourne – 03 8644 7320
13/200 Queen St
Melbourne Vic 3000

Frankston – 03 8644 7322
8/395-399 Nepean Hwy
Frankston VIC, 3199

Ballarat – 03 8644 7310
Armstrong House
17 Armstrong Street South
Ballarat Central VIC, 3350

Dandenong – 03 8644 7315
1a/147 Foster St
Dandenong, VIC, 3175

Moorabbin – 03 8644 7328
Level 1, 441 South Rd
Moorabbin, Vic, 3189

Geelong – 03 8644 7300
2/13 Fenwick Street
Geelong Vic 3220

Ringwood – 03 8644 7325
7/2 Nelson St
Ringwood VIC 3134

Werribee – (03) 9116 9595
9/7 Bridge Street
Werribee VIC 3030

Dribbin & Brown

  • About Us
  • What We Do
  • The System
  • Criminal Defences
  • Sentences
  • Criminal Lawyers Blog
  • Client Testimonials

Melbourne – 03 8644 7320
13/200 Queen St
Melbourne Vic 3000

Frankston – 03 8644 7322
8/395-399 Nepean Hwy
Frankston VIC, 3199

Ballarat – 03 8644 7310
Armstrong House
17 Armstrong Street South
Ballarat Central VIC, 3350

Dandenong – 03 8644 7315
1a/147 Foster St
Dandenong, VIC, 3175

Moorabbin – 03 8644 7328
Level 1, 441 South Rd
Moorabbin, Vic, 3189

Geelong – 03 8644 7300
2/13 Fenwick Street
Geelong Vic 3220

Ringwood – 03 8644 7325
7/2 Nelson St
Ringwood VIC 3134

Werribee – (03) 9116 9595
9/7 Bridge Street
Werribee VIC 3030

© 2021 Dribbin & Brown

Facebook-f Twitter

Dribbin & Brown

  • About Us
  • What We Do
  • The System
  • Criminal Defences
  • Sentences
  • Criminal Lawyers Blog
  • Client Testimonials

7am to Midnight Phone Service: +61 (03) 8644 7320  Contact Us | Book An Appointment

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Traffic Lawyers Melbourne

7am to 12am Phone Service: +61 (03) 8644 7320
Contact Us | Book An Appointment
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Traffic Lawyers Melbourne