Skip to content
  • +61 3 8644 7320
  • Email
  • Phone 7am to 12 Midnight - 7 days
  • Make a Booking
  • 中文
  • Locations
  • Contact
Search
Close this search box.
  • +61 3 8644 7320
  • Phone 7am to 12am - 7 days
  • 中文
Search
Close this search box.
  • 中文
Search
Close this search box.
  • +61 3 8644 7320
  • Phone 7am to Midnight - 7 days
Dribbin & Brown Criminal Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Our Lawyers
  • Criminal Defences
  • The System
  • Sentences
  • Blog
  • Locations
    • Ballarat
    • Broadmeadows
    • Dandenong
    • Frankston
    • Geelong
    • Melbourne CBD
    • Moorabbin
    • Ringwood
    • Werribee
  • Contact
Menu
  • Legal Services
  • Our Lawyers
  • Criminal Defences
  • The System
  • Sentences
  • Blog
  • Locations
    • Ballarat
    • Broadmeadows
    • Dandenong
    • Frankston
    • Geelong
    • Melbourne CBD
    • Moorabbin
    • Ringwood
    • Werribee
  • Contact

Honest and Reasonable Mistake

Contents of this page

Honest and Reasonable Mistake Of Fact

The defence of “Honest and Reasonable Mistake” is only available for strict liability offences. A strict liability offence is an offence that does not require a fault element (intention, knowledge or recklessness on behalf of the accused). Further, the prosecution does not need to prove that the accused intended to commit the alleged offence.

Having an honest and reasonable mistake as to a set of facts can make a defendant’s act innocent, providing vindication for doing what would otherwise be a criminal offence. The defence has three elements:

  • The mistake must be honest (subjective);
  • The mistake must be reasonable (objective); and
  • The mistake must be as to fact and not law.

An honest and reasonable mistake can be used to argue that an accused did not realise or know that what they were doing was unlawful because of the mistaken fact. Many charges can be defended using this defence, most commonly it is used to defend driving whilst disqualified or driving whilst suspended charges. It is also often used to defend the charge of ‘Dealing with Property Suspected of Being the Proceeds of Crime’ (section 195 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic)).

For this defence to be successful, both components, ‘honest’ and ‘reasonable’ must be established. Commonly only the first element is met. Any consideration of reasonableness should be made in consultation with an experienced criminal lawyer prior to proceeding to Court. 

Strict Liability

Strict liability offences are those that do not require proof of fault or intent per se’. An example is driving whilst suspended. For police to prosecute this offence they only need to prove that the accused person was driving on a road during a period in which their driver’s licence was suspended. Not that they intended to drive whilst suspended. In this example the accused person might claim that they were not notified of their suspension by VicRoads and therefore are not at fault. This would form the accused’s honest belief. There however would then need to be an assessment of whether the belief held by the accused was reasonable. The accused would raise the evidentiary burden and it would then be incumbent upon the prosecution to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the belief was either not honest or reasonable or both. If the accused did not raise the defence then it would not be incumbent on the prosecution to provide the element of intention. 

The burden of establishing honest and reasonable mistake

As explained in He Kaw Teh v The Queen [1985),the evidentiary burden is on the accused to establish the defence of Honest and Reasonable Mistake, but once raised the onus shifts to the Prosecution to show that no such belief existed. The prosecution must prove this beyond a reasonable doubt.

The case on point in relation to the defence of honest and reasonable mistake of fact is Proudman V Dayman [1941].

Is the belief honest?

The Proudman defence requires a positive belief to have been formed by the accused, not merely ignorance. 

In the case of Knight it was established that if the trier of fact finds that an inference or hypothesis consistent with innocence is open on the evidence, they must give the accused the benefit of the doubt in relation to that inference, this applies to the consideration of what might be an honest belief (Knight v R (1992) 175 CLR 495).

If the belief reasonable?

The accused must expressly turn his or her mind to a particular fact and make an honest mistake which was reasonable in the circumstances— as opposed to not considering the matter at all – He Kaw Teh v The Queen [1985].

The leading case on reasonableness is found in the case of Mei Ying Su and Others v Australian Fisheries Management Authority and Another (no2) (2008) at paragraph 106 where the court stated

a) It does not involve the hypothetical ordinary or reasonable person test.

b) It requires that the belief be that of the accused

c) It requires that the accused’s belief be objectively reasonable, that is, rational, based on reason, or capable of sustaining belief and

d) It requires the objective reasonableness of the accused’s belief to be assessed by reference to the subjective circumstances in which the accused was placed, including the accused personal attributes and the information available to him at the time.

When the accused successfully shows that s/he acted due to a mistaken belief the prosecutions must show beyond a reasonable doubt that no reasonable belief was held. If the prosecution cannot do this the accused will be acquitted.

Application of the Defence

As explained, the defence is only available in relation to strict liability offences. Circumstances in which an accused could utilise this defence include:

  • Driving whilst authorisation suspended
  • Indecent act, mistake as to age
  • Dealing with Property Suspected of Being the Proceeds of Crime
  • Failing to stop/render assistance/report to police (that is mistake as to an accident occurring)

Consider the following example; an accused did not know they were suspended from driving because they did not receive a letter notifying them of this from VicRoads. The notification was delivered to their former address despite having updated their address with VicRoads. This person in these circumstances may be able to establish the defence of honest and reasonable mistake. If on the other hand the person had not updated their address then this may be harder to defend, as the Court may find this not to be reasonable, i.e. how do you expect to receive a notice when you have not updated your address. 

If you have been charged with any criminal offending, do not try and represent yourself, you may have a defence open to you, the only way to determine this will be to make an appointment with one of our experienced criminal solicitors. 

Our Legal Services

Appeals

Assault Offences

Asset Confiscation

Bail Application

Breach Offences

Centrelink Fraud

Children’s Court

Computer Offences

Council Charges

Drink Driving

Driving Offences

Drug Offences

Family Violence

Firearm Offences

Fraud Offences

Infringement Warrants

Intervention Orders

Murder Trials

Perjury Charges

Pervert the Course of Justice

Royal Commission

RSPCA Offences

Sex Offences

Theft

Traffic Offences

Violence

Weapons

White Collar Crime

Latest Case Studies

Breach Intervention Order Ringwood

Breach of Sex Offenders Registration Obligations Melbourne

CCO Result for Drug Trafficking Victoria

Cultivate Cannabis Charges

Diversion For Careless Driving

Diversion For Family Violence

Diversion For Stalking and Trespass

Diversion For Unlawful Assault

Intentionally Cause Injury Dandenong

Personal Safety Application Victoria

Recklessly Causing Injury – Dandenong

Section 123 of the Family Violence Protection Act 2008

Sexual Assault Charges Victoria

Threat to Kill; Intentionally Causing Injury

Trafficking Drug of Dependence Ecstasy

  • Law Institute Accredited Specialist Criminal Lawyers
  • Legal Aid enquiries welcome
  • Over 100 years firm experience practising as traffic lawyers and criminal defence lawyers
specialist criminal solicitor warning
Do not ask any firm to act on your behalf in relation to a criminal or traffic law offence unless they specialise in criminal or traffic law.
  • Law Institute Accredited Specialist Criminal Lawyers
  • Legal Aid enquiries welcome
  • Over 100 years firm experience practising as traffic lawyers and criminal defence lawyers
specialist criminal solicitor warning
Do not ask any firm to act on your behalf in relation to a criminal or traffic law offence unless they specialise in criminal or traffic law.

What Our Clients Say

Ross M
Dear Dave, Just a follow up thanks for your professional service & presentation yesterday – very happy with the outcome and the comments from the Magistrate. Thanks again, and...
Helen and Lingbo Yang
Thank you for your support and help of Lingbo’s case for these days and everything is going smoothly. The outcome is better than we expected because of your rich...
Yvonne and Peter Braithwaite
Thanks for your excellent work for Yvonne last Friday. Your courtesy, empathy and professionalism was greatly appreciated. All the best for the future.
Haley M
We cannot thank you enough, it still doesn't feel real to us yet as it has caused a lot of strain and stress over a very long period of...
Sam B
Thank you for your outstanding service.... A great result for us...
Russell P
Dear David and Team I would like to “Thank You” for a job well done. The result, from the trial was truly amazing. I very much appreciated your courtesy, professionalism...
Adrian W
A big thank you Dave. You made it seamless. You are a quality egg and hopefully I'll see you again under different circumstances. All the best!
…
Mike! Jacqui was great! Re my drive whist suspended charge, I held my license with a small fine to be payed in 4 months! Can't thank you enough! Thanks for...
Maria
Many thanks for the wonderful support I received from David Dribbin as he represented me in court today. It was an extremely emotional experience for me and without judgement...
Michael S
Dear Rebeca, Thank you again for your support and guidance over the past six months, it is my belief that Dribbin and Brown went far beyond there charter when...
Grant B
I phoned Michael Brown of Dribbin and Brown after total disappointment in another criminal lawyer firm... In my situation that required communication, information and a great deal of understanding,...

Need help? Call our 7am to Midnight Phone Service on +61 03 8644 7320

Dribbin & Brown Criminal Solicitors Melbourne

Facebook-f Twitter

© 2023 Dribbin & Brown

Melbourne – 03 8644 7320
13/200 Queen St
Melbourne Vic 3000

Frankston – 03 8644 7322
8/395-399 Nepean Hwy
Frankston VIC, 3199

Ballarat – 03 8644 7310
Eureka House
11 Lydiard Street South
Ballarat VIC, 3350

Dandenong – 03 8644 7315
1a/147 Foster St
Dandenong, VIC, 3175

Moorabbin – 03 8644 7328
Level 1, 441 South Rd
Moorabbin, Vic, 3189

Geelong – 03 8644 7300
2/13 Fenwick Street
Geelong Vic 3220

Ringwood – 03 8644 7325
7/2 Nelson St
Ringwood VIC 3134

Werribee – 03 9116 9595
9/7 Bridge Street
Werribee VIC 3030

Broadmeadows – 03 9116 9500
StartNorth at Townhall
12 Dimboola Rd
Broadmeadows VIC 3047

Dribbin & Brown

  • About Us
  • What We Do
  • The System
  • Criminal Defences
  • Sentences
  • Criminal Lawyers Blog
  • Client Testimonials
  • Sitemap

Melbourne – 03 8644 7320
13/200 Queen St
Melbourne Vic 3000

Frankston – 03 8644 7322
8/395-399 Nepean Hwy
Frankston VIC, 3199

Ballarat – 03 8644 7310
Eureka House
11 Lydiard Street South
Ballarat VIC, 3350

Ringwood – 03 8644 7325
7/2 Nelson St
Ringwood VIC 3134

Dandenong – 03 8644 7315
1a/147 Foster St
Dandenong, VIC, 3175

Moorabbin – 03 8644 7328
Level 1, 441 South Rd
Moorabbin, Vic, 3189

Geelong – 03 8644 7300
2/13 Fenwick Street
Geelong Vic 3220

Broadmeadows – (03) 9116 9500
StartNorth at Townhall
12 Dimboola Rd
Broadmeadows VIC 3047

Werribee – 03 9116 9595
9/7 Bridge Street
Werribee VIC 3030

© 2023 Dribbin & Brown

Facebook-f Twitter

Dribbin & Brown

  • About Us
  • What We Do
  • The System
  • Criminal Defences
  • Sentences
  • Criminal Lawyers Blog
  • Client Testimonials

7am to Midnight Phone Service: +61 03 8644 7320  Contact Us | Book An Appointment

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Traffic Lawyers Melbourne

7am to 12am Phone Service: +61 03 8644 7320
Contact Us | Book An Appointment
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Traffic Lawyers Melbourne