Wondering what crimes will get you deported from Australia?
If you are not an Australian citizen and reside in Australia without a valid visa, you are classified as an ‘unlawful non-citizen’. The Australian Government Department of Home Affairs has the power to detain you in immigration detention and remove you from its borders. Non-citizens become unlawful and subject to removal or deportation for visa cancellation for failing the ‘character test’ or if they are convicted of serious criminal offences.
Those who are convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for at least 12 months or are convicted of certain prescribed crimes (such as sexual offences involving children) face mandatory visa cancellation. Conviction for other crimes does not mandate visa cancellation but renders it a possibility.
Deportation or removal from Australia can severely impact your life and relationships. If you are facing criminal charges and hold either a temporary or permanent Australian visa, it is crucial to seek legal advice from an experienced criminal law specialist to ensure your rights are protected.
Unlawful non-citizens should seek advice from an Immigration Lawyer before making any decisions regarding their immigration status or leaving Australia voluntarily. Depending on the circumstances, it may be possible for an unlawful non-citizen to ‘regularise’ their immigration status with an onshore visa application, such as by obtaining a bridging visa.
Read on for more information about visa cancellation in relation to criminal conduct and appealing a visa cancellation decision.
Yes permanent residents will be deported from Australia if they commit a crime and are sentenced to imprisonment for at least 12 months or have been convicted of certain prescribed crimes (e.g. involving children or those of a sexual nature), cancellation of their VISA in these circumstances is mandatory per section 501 of the Migration Act.. Conviction for other crimes renders cancellation a possibility under the same section. The Minister also has power under section 201 of the Migration Act to cancel the VISA of a permanent resident that is sentenced to more than a year in prison, within 10 years of becoming a permanent resident. However this section is rarely used because it is easier under section 501 and no time limit applies.
Regardless of any crimes committed in Australia, an Australian citizen cannot be deported in any circumstances other than extradition,that is, circumstances where they have committed a crime in another country in which Australia has an agreement regarding extradition.
Where a person is being deported, that person is required to pay to the Commonwealth the amount that it will cost to see the person existed from the county per s210 of the Migration Act. The same applies when someone is kept in custody prior to being deported, they will be liable for that cost as well. Department officers have power to seize valuables to secure payment towards the above costs per s224 of the Migration Act.
A person can be forcibly removed from Australia by either deportation or removal.
Deportation requires a specific order to be made under section 200 of the Migration Act 1958 and can only be used on permanent residents who commit serious criminal offences within the first 10 years of their entry to Australia (s201).
In contrast, the mechanism for removal is an automatic process that applies to unlawful non-citizens who have had their visas cancelled under section 501 of the Migration Act for failing the character test, which results from the commission of criminal offences in certain circumstances. While deportation requires a specific order to be made under the Migration Act, removal takes place automatically.
While permanent residents can be subject to a deportation order for committing certain criminal offences under section 200, they will typically be subject to the removal process and have their visas cancelled under section 501 of the Migration Act for failing the character test.
Any person in Australia who is not an Australian citizen and who holds a visa that is in effect is considered a ‘lawful non-citizen’ (see s13). Section 14 provides that any non-citizen in Australia who does not meet the definition of being a lawful non-citizen is an ‘unlawful non-citizen‘.
An unlawful non-citizen therefore includes a person who:
Whatever the grounds for a person’s visa cancellation, if they are in Australia and no longer hold a visa that is in effect, they immediately become an ‘unlawful non-citizen’.
A non-citizen who is a permanent resident in Australia for less than 10 years may be deported if they are convicted in Australia of any offence for which they are sentenced to imprisonment for one year or longer (s 201 Migration Act).
Such a non-citizen is similarly liable to deportation if they are sentenced to two or more terms of imprisonment in which the total of the terms is 12 months or more. Under section 201, a person cannot be deported after being lawfully resident in Australia for more than 10 years, except in very exceptional circumstances.
However, this section is rarely used due to the broad and more draconian powers available to the Minister and Department of Home Affairs. Under s501 of the Migration Act, a non-citizen’s visa can be cancelled no matter how long they have lived in Australia, making the person an unlawful non-citizen who is then subject to removal.
Other grounds for deportation of non-citizens under the Migration Act, which are rarely used, include:
Even conduct that does not amount to criminal conduct can result in visa cancellation under section 501 for failing the character test where the decision Minister of their delegate believes it is in the public interests to do so.
Under section 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958, the Minister must cancel an offender’s visa if:
Importantly, under point three, an offender will not have their visa automatically cancelled, for example, if they have served a large amount of pre-sentence detention, receive a term of imprisonment of 12 months or more and get released straight away.
Under the Migration Act 1958, “imprisonment” is defined as “any form of punitive detention in a facility or institution.” This broad definition, therefore, includes youth detention and custodial supervision orders.
Section 501(7A) of the Migration Act disregards whether sentences are served concurrently or cumulatively. Instead of calculating the total effective sentence (the actual time spent in prison), the entire length of each term is added together to determine whether an offender has been sentenced to 12 months or more of imprisonment.
For example, if a person is sentenced to two concurrent 3-month terms of imprisonment for two offences (resulting in a total effective sentence of 3 months), the Migration Act calculates this as 6 months.
A non-citizen facing charges for multiple low-level offences that add up to 12 months of imprisonment could face automatic visa cancellation. It is, therefore, very important that a lawyer considers the total term of imprisonment if a non-citizen is charged with multiple low-level offences. When pleading guilty to multiple offences in the Magistrates’ Court, an experienced lawyer can make submissions to avoid automatic visa cancellation.
Under section 501, the Minister has discretion to cancel a visa if the Minister “reasonably suspects” that a person fails the “character test”. This can be based on a person’s past or present criminal conduct or even past or present “general conduct”. This gives the Minister very broad discretion to cancel a visa.
This means a non-citizen’s visa can be cancelled even if they were acquitted of a criminal offence or have not been convicted of any crime. For example, this could occur if the Minister reasonably suspects a person has an association with a group or person involved in criminal conduct, even if a person has not been found guilty of anything.
Under section 116(1), the Minister also has discretionary power to cancel a visa where “the presence of its holder in Australia is or may be, or would, or might be, a risk to the health, safety or good order of the Australian community or a segment of the Australian community”.
A person who has a visa cancelled under section 501 may be able to apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) for merits review of the decision, or they may only be able to challenge the legality of the decision by judicial review in court.
However, if the Minister “personally” makes the cancellation decision under section 501, rather than through a delegate, there is no right of review before the AAT (s500(1)(b)).
There are strict time limits regarding applications for review of a decision and when seeking judicial review. If your visa has been cancelled, engage an experienced migration lawyer as soon as possible to ensure you meet the necessary deadlines and explore all available options.
A non-citizen person facing deportation under sections 201 or 501 of the Migration Act 1958 may be able to apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) for review of the merits of the decision to cancel their visa under section 500 of the Act. However, if the Minister personally (as opposed to a delegate) decides to cancel a person’s visa, this decision is not subject to merits review (see s500(1)(b)).
During a merits review, the AAT reviews the original decision to determine if it is the correct or preferable decision, which can be affirmed, varied or set aside (Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43(1)).
However, if the AAT sets aside the decision and decides not to exercise the power to cancel a person’s visa, in certain circumstances, the Minister may set the AAT’s decision aside and cancel the visa if it is in the national interest under section 501A.
All visa decisions under section 501, whether made by a delegate or the Minister personally, may be subject to judicial review by the Federal Court or the High Court of Australia. Under judicial review, courts review the lawfulness of an administrative decision rather than whether the decision was correct.
If a court finds that a visa decision was affected by jurisdictional error, the court can set aside the original decision and return the matter to the decision maker for reconsideration. This situation might arise, for example, if the decision maker failed to take into account primary or other relevant considerations that it was bound to take into account (s501(5) and s501A(4)).
While a decision to revoke a visa and deport a non-citizen can be contested, successful appeals of visa cancellation decisions on character grounds are very difficult. In the 5-year period to 30 June 2023, only 29% of visa cancellation decisions on character grounds were successfully revoked (see visa character cancellation statistics).
The immigration policy, ‘Ministerial Direction No. 99’, outlines the current key principles that must be considered when making visa decisions under the Migration Act 1958. Direction 99 provides guidance for decision-makers on how to handle visa refusals or cancellations under section 501, as well as how to revoke a visa cancellation under section 501CA (see s499(2)).
Direction No. 99 emphasises that non-citizens who engage in criminal activity should expect to face visa cancellation and deportation, and makes it clear that it is very difficult to have a visa cancellation decision reversed. See the following passages for example:
“Non-citizens who engage or have engaged in criminal or other serious conduct should expect to be denied the privilege of coming to, or to forfeit the privilege of staying in, Australia…”
“In some circumstances, the nature of the non-citizen’s conduct… may be so serious that even strong countervailing considerations may be insufficient to justify not cancelling or refusing the visa…In particular, the inherent nature of certain conduct such as family violence … is so serious that even strong countervailing considerations may be insufficient in some circumstances, even if the non-citizen does not pose a measurable risk to of causing harm to the Australian community”.
Under Direction No. 99, when making a decision under section 501(1), 501(2) or 501CA(4), the following primary considerations must be taken into account:
Secondary considerations include:
It is important to note the relatively new emphasis on family violence as a circumstance taken into account, such that even relatively low-level family violence can trigger deportation from Australia.
The third primary consideration is also a new consideration that may assist New Zealand citizens who move to Australia and live here for many years as permanent residents but face deportation after committing offences.
While circumstances faced by a person who came to Australia as a refugee who may face extreme danger in another country if deported are relevant considerations, these considerations are secondary to the protection of the Australian community and the other primary considerations.
In Victoria, the prospect of deportation for offenders holding valid visas, even if convicted of a Commonwealth offence, is a relevant consideration during sentencing and can be a mitigating factor in certain circumstances (Guden v The Queen [2010] VSCA 196). This approach is not followed in NSW, WA, or NT, where deportation is viewed as irrelevant to sentencing.
As stated in the case of Allouche v the Queen [2018] VSCA 244 at [40], “a court should only reduce a sentence based upon the prospect of deportation where there is sufficient evidence of both the risk, and the impact of that risk, under s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)”.
However, the prospect of deportation will not be mitigated in some cases, such as if the offender was unlawfully in Australia or if there is no risk of hardship to the offender in being deported.
It is important to note that whether you are going to be deported or not needs to be determined in a timely fashion.
The most recent High Court case of NZYQ sets out that indefinite immigration is unlawful in Australia. In response to this, changes to the Criminal Code were passed to create Community Safety Orders (CSO’s) to apply to people who would have previously been subject to indefinite immigration detention.
Facing visa cancellation or deportation due to criminal charges. Dribbin & Brown lawyers can provide you with expert criminal legal advice in relation to getting you the best outcome regarding your criminal charges and attempt to avoid you being persecuted because of the complexities of Australian immigration law. Don’t wait until it’s too late, if you have been charged in relation to criminal offending – book an appointment with us today, before your matter is finalised, so we can determine what can be done for you. If you wait until after your criminal court case it will be too late.
Search
